News

Sun's chief reporter accuses the paper's executives of "breaking the first rule of journalism", as court clears four Sun journalists of all charges

20/03/2015

The former chief reporter of The Sun has accused the paper's executives of "breaking the first rule of journalism", by revealing his confidential sources after being found not guilty of making corrupt payments to a public official.Speaking just minutes after his acquittal John Kay, 71, attacked News International (now News UK) for giving the police information which led to the arrest of Ministry of Defence civil servant Bettina Jordan-Barber for selling Kay information about army matters. Jordan-Barber later pleaded guilty to misconduct in a public office and was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment.The jury also acquitted Sun Royal Editor, Duncan Larcombe; Executive Editor Fergus Shanahan; and Deputy Editor Geoffrey Webster on similar charges. There is no doubt that the verdicts will promote a debate in the media and especially the newspapers, about the wisdom of the Crown Prosecution Service's decision to prosecute individual journalists rather than to consider corporate charges against the company itself.During the nine week trial the jury was told that after the phone-hacking scandal News UK uploaded over 23 million emails into a secure computer system and these were then made available to the Metropolitan police to search for evidence of corruption. The four journalists argued in court that they received no training or guidance from their employers that paying public officials could lead to criminal charges despite their stories having been checked by the newspaper's legal department.The court was also told that the vast majority of the payments made to Jordan-Barber were personally signed off by then Sun editor Rebekah Brooks, although she testified in court last year that she had never been told the cash was destined for a civil servant. During the case a News International witness told the court that staff "lived in fear" during Brooks reign as editor.Also found not guilty were former soldier John Hardy, who accused Sun management of "selling out the lower people" and his wife Claire who testified that she did not know the money her husband received was from the newspaper.Although this case is over, the Old Bailey is currently hosting a trial of another three Sun reporters and a former Mirror reporter on similar charges and other Sun and Mirror journalists are due to face a jury later this year.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News