News

The Phantom Paramedic: A failure of journalism or Islamophobic reporting at The Star and Express?

11/05/2021

Ella Boon

[vc_row][vc_column width="1/2"][vc_single_image image="13730" img_size="400x200" alignment="right"][/vc_column][vc_column width="1/2"][vc_single_image image="38753" img_size="400x200"][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

A paramedic told talkRADIO that he wasn't allowed to enter a mosque on the basis of his sexuality - a story later reproduced in two national newspapers.

But was he even real?

Or were these events fabricated, and a stark reminder of how easily misinformation can be spread by newspapers?

By Hacked Off intern, Ella BoonOn Friday 26th of March, talkRADIO received a phone call from a 'paramedic called Tom'.The host of the show Cristo Foufas spoke to 'Tom' on air for around 17 minutes. During this time, 'Tom' described an incident whereby, in the words of talkRADIO in a tweet, "he was stopped from entering a mosque in Oldham to render assistance to a heart attack victim and lives in constant fear after death threats"According to 'Tom', he was refused entry to the mosque because he was gay.

Both the Daily Star and Express ran the story with sensationalist headlines. The Express embedded a snippet of the talkRADIO interview under the headline "Gay paramedic says he was 'refused entry' to a mosque", whilst the Star provided a limited interview transcript.

It appears that neither paper attempted to contact 'Tom' or corroborate the story.

LGBT people across the country face prejudice based on their sexuality every day. Where this occurs, it must be exposed.

However, this story now appears to be nothing more than a tale. In the interview, 'Tom' described how the individual barring access to the mosque presumed his sexuality by his appearance because he had lots of piercings. He also stated that he had spoken to his superiors about the incident.

However, when the North West Ambulance (NWAS) investigated the claim, they "found no record of this incident and contrary to what the caller said on air, the local management team has not been informed of any such exchange taking place."

Moreover, they did not know anyone of that description working for the NWAS.

Dezinformatsiya is the Russian origin word for disinformation, the process of inventing stories to mislead people and intentionally presenting false claims as fact. The less malicious but equally dangerous sibling of disinformation is misinformation, the spreading of untrue information unknowingly, as "the people sharing it think that [it] is true."

This distinction is important when understanding the British press' role in fuelling prejudice against the Muslim community, which contributes to public distrust.

In this case, the story was called out as totally unsubstantiated in a revealing Twitter thread from the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), which exposed the whole story as without evidence or basis, on a thirsty news day.

How did talkRADIO respond? In a video apology, the interviewer Foufas says, "we accepted [Tom’s] story in good faith" and "we took his details in case there was an occasion where we needed to verify what he said". Thus abdicating the station from journalistic responsibility to verify sources before broadcast (which is especially important when dealing with such a potentially damaging claim.)

Exposing the public to these damaging inaccuracies is likely to fuel distrust of Muslim communities. The allegation of homophobia – particularly serious given the ongoing reality of homophobia right across our society – contributes to the false and Islamophobic narrative that the Muslim faith is somehow “incompatible” with a liberal way of life.

Commenting on the story the Director of MCB's Centre for Media Monitoring,Rizwana Hamid, said:

"This kind of irresponsible journalism only serves to demonise an already vulnerable community. In making his claims of discrimination, 'Tom' employed several tropes which the far-right use to justify their Islamophobia. Painting the Muslim community as homophobic, intolerant, and extreme, and making demonstrably false claims of 'no-go areas' with heavy Muslim populations where others feel unsafe, only serve to cause animosity between Muslims and others, and fuel the flames of hatred that are growing in the UK."

Ella Boon tweets at @LadyB00n[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News