News

The Sun has a 7ft-high safe stuffed full of unpublished photographs, stories and videos of people in public life, court hears

26/11/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

The Sun has a 7ft-high safe stuffed full of unpublished photographs, stories and videos of people in public life, one of its former executives told the paper's corruption trial.

Ben O'Driscoll, who denies three counts of conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office, described the safe as he began his defence.

The former deputy news editor said that the Sun carefully assessed stories involving "confidential" information and the editor would decide whether publication was in the public interest.

He told Kingston Crown Court that those stories that were not in the public interest ended up in the safe in the middle of the newsroom.

Mr O'Driscoll, who left the Sun in 2011 to become deputy news editor of the Daily Mail, where he still works, told the trial: "There was an enormous safe, 7ft high – it looks like something out of the Wild West – and that safe is full of about 30 years of stories which are confidential and did not pass the public interest test."

What's in there is quite eye-popping, I must say."

He went on: "It would be photographs, videos, reports; ordinarily it would involve MPs, celebrities... there are royals in there. If you were to publish everything in that safe The Sun's circulation would go up."

Mr O'Driscoll said that he was innocent of the charges against him.

He denied a claim made by a former colleague, district reporter Jamie Pyatt, that he had been informed about Mr Pyatt's meetings with public officials.

Mr O'Driscoll, who had been sitting close to Mr Pyatt in the glass-fronted dock moments before, said: "It pains me greatly to say this but Mr Pyatt was not telling the truth."

Asked by Judge Richard Marks for further clarity, Mr O'Driscoll said: "I think Mr Pyatt said yesterday that he told the newsdesk when he was meeting public officials and was updating us about those meetings. He said he kept us updated of any story he was working on that involved a public official."

Mr O'Driscoll's lawyer, Martin Hicks, asked: "So would you receive any calls of that nature from him?"

The former executive replied: "Never.""Or from any other journalist?"

Mr O'Driscoll replied: "Never.""Or any emails about who he was going to meet or the product of that meeting?"

Again, the journalist replied: "Never."

Mr Pyatt, Mr O'Driscoll and four other Sun journalists deny conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office. The case continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News