News

Trial of Sun journalists suspended after 2 months due to illness

04/12/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

After two months of almost constant hearings, the trial of Sun journalists accused of making or agreeing illegal payments to police officers and other public officials was suspended yesterday (Wednesday).

Shortly after 10am Judge Richard Marks called in 10 jurors at Kingston Crown Court, told them that two of their colleagues had fallen ill, and sent them home for the day.

The trial, which began on 6 October, had been due to hear the cross-examination by the Crown's QC, Peter Wright, of The Sun's former managing editor Graham Dudman.

Mr Dudman, who entered the witness box on Monday, is the fifth of the six defendants (four of them news executives) to have given evidence in the case.

In a short address to the jury, who have so far passed to the judge 25 handwritten notes containing questions, Mr Justice Marks said: "We've had a remarkably good run in that we've not lost a single day to illness.”

He said that was "an achievement at this time of year,” adding: "But sadly two of your number have rung in ill so obviously we're not going to be able to sit today… Sorry about this; it's unavoidable."

Mr Dudman, 51, is on trial alongside five current or former colleagues: Chris Pharo, Head of News; John Edwards, Picture Editor; Jamie Pyatt, the Thames Valley reporter; John Troup, a former district reporter; and Ben O'Driscoll, former deputy news editor – and now deputy news editor of the Daily Mail.

All five defendants who have given evidence have told the court that the stories printed in the Sun arising from agreed or alleged payments to public officials were in the public interest and did not contain confidential information given by the officials.

Each is represented by the most expensive and senior rank of barrister, Queen’s Counsel, backed by junior barrister and note-taking solicitor.

For Mr Troup is William Clegg QC (lead counsel) and Jacqueline Carey (junior counsel); for Mr Pharo Nigel Rumfitt QC and Ross Johnson; for Mr O'Driscoll Martin Hicks QC and Christopher Ware; for Mr Edwards Sasha Wass QC and Alison Morgan; for Mr Pyatt Richard Kovalevsky QC and Jamas Hodivala; and for Mr Dudman (now Editorial Development Director at the Sun) Oliver Blunt QC and David Miller.

The Crown is represented by Peter Wright QC and Oliver Glasgow, his junior.

There are so many bewigged barristers in the court that lawyers take up the entirety of three long benches in front of the judge.

The defendants sit behind a glass-walled dock of Court 9.

All deny the charges.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News