News

Two mystery cars surveilling Chelsea Harbour, hacking trial learns

22/01/2014

By Martin HickmanTwo mystery cars were conducting surveillance of Chelsea Harbour around the time Rebekah Brooks was arrested for phone hacking, according to a counter-surveillance expert working for Rupert Murdoch's newspapers.Tony Cox, a director of Corunna Solutions Ltd, told police that when Mrs Brooks was released from Lewisham police station on the night of 17 July 2011 the riverside complex was being watched by a Silver Audi A3 and a gun-metal grey Astra.Mr Cox, a counter-surveillance expert working for News International, gave no further information about the vehicles in a witness statement he gave to the Metropolitan Police on 13 March 2012.The statement was read out at the phone hacking trial at the Old Bailey by chief prosecutor Andrew Edis QC.In it, Mr Cox said Corunna Solutions had been sub-contracted by another security firm contracted to NI, International Corporate Protection, to help protect Mrs Brooks, who was given the codename Black Hawk.Corunna's role included carrying out conduct counter-surveillance to protect Mrs Brooks from "hostile" journalists and members of the public.Mr Cox said that as well as the two mystery vehicles, another two cars were surveilling Chelsea Harbour around the time of Mrs Brooks's arrest: a black Hackney carriage and a Volkswagen Golf belonging to Corunna Solutions.He told detectives that Mrs Brooks had returned to Chelsea Harbour, where she lived with her racehorse trainer husband Charlie, in a black Audi A8 shortly after midnight on 18 July 2011.Mrs Brooks, Mr Brooks and News International's group director of security, Mark Hanna, deny hiding evidence from detectives as part of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.The trial continues.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News