News

No more compromises over press regulation

20/06/2013

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Letter from victims of press abuses to The Guardian

Published 20th June 2013It is baffling and disappointing tous, as people who have suffered some of the worst press abuses ofrecent years, that the Guardian suddenly appears ready to surrenderto the manipulations of press corporations responsible for many ofthose abuses (Inpraise of… Michael Grade,19 June). Your newspaper, whichdid more than any other institution to bring those corporations tobook, is advocating a delay that plays directly into their hands.

Before us is a hard-won opportunity: a draft royal charter that isbased on the recommendations of the Leveson inquiry, approved by every party in parliament and backedby public opinion and by victims of abuses such as ourselves. Afterseven inquiries into the press in 70 years we are closer than everto an effective, independent press self-regulation scheme that willprotect the public and at the same time protect freedom ofexpression. This is in large part a consequence of having victimsproperly represented for the first time by the campaigngroup, Hacked Off.

Yet the Guardian now calls for further compromise, even though the charteralready contains many concessions to press demands. You urge morenegotiation with proprietors and editors who have learned nothing and shown no contrition, and who have consistently rejected compromise. You complain of drift when the only drift is caused bythem, in their desperation to defy parliament and sabotage thecharter.

The surest consequence of the delay you propose will the kind of shady fix we have seen so many times before, and so we will be left at best with another sham self-regulator no better than thePress Complaints Commission. Please do not allow this to happen.

The judge has spoken, parliament has spoken and the polls indicate that your readers favour a Leveson-based outcome. Don't lose yournerve now.

Yours,Sheila HollinsChristopher JefferiesIan HurstJacqui HamesHJKBen JacksonMike HollingsworthAlex BestEd BlumSky AndrewTricia CooklinTom RowlandCiara ParkesProfessor John TullochJane WinterMargaret and Jim WatsonJoan Smith

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News