an inference which is supported by Mark Thomson’s evidence to the Inquiry

the prescient inferences which he was prepared to draw from less cogent material would have been even stronger.

in particular para 33

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

help us do more

Britain deserves a better press.
Your donation helps us get there.

£5 per month £10 per month £25 per month custom amount

Will you join us?

We believe the press should be held to standards which protect the public, strengthen democracy and safeguard freedom of expression.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

By submitting your details you agree to receive email updates about the campaign. We will always keep your data safe and you may unsubscribe at any time.

No items found.

Hacked Off campaigns for meaningful reform of UK press self-regulation, ensuring that the victims of press abuse have their voices heard and are given protection from continuing intrusions.

General enquiries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org
Media enquiries: press@hackinginquiry.org
Phone: +44 (0) 7513 315081

address

The Hacked Off Campaign
Bank House Southwick Square
Southwick
Brighton | BN42 4FN

Donate Act sign up Complaint about the press?

an inference which is supported by Mark Thomson’s evidence to the Inquiry

Download the full report:

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

Will you join us?

related Posts