Fight back

Megaphone

Asylum centre '£270m' cost is a campaigners' estimate, not an official figure

20/10/2026

Hacked Off

Newspaper
Daily Express
✕ Press claim

The Daily Express said calculations revealed a planned asylum centre at Linton-on-Ouse would cost taxpayers £270m, or up to £853 per bed per night.

✓ The truth

The figures are a campaign group's projections, assuming the site runs under two years. The Home Office says at least three, and has published no cost estimate.

Reach
Up to
16.4 million
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP
Fight back: Asylum centre '£270m' cost is a campaigners' estimate, not an official figure

On 19 October 2026, the Daily Express reported that “calculations revealed” a planned asylum centre at the former RAF Linton-on-Ouse base would “cost taxpayers £270m” – between £443 and £853 per bed per night.

It matters because the figure is being used to stoke opposition to the site, and readers were given no way to judge how firm it is.

The facts

The figures are the Linton-on-Ouse Action Group’s own projections, not Home Office costings. They assume the site runs for less than two years, based on a July 2029 handback date that the Deputy Mayor described as her “understanding” and asked the Home Office to confirm.

The Home Office says it is still considering the site, and that if approved it would be used for at least three years – spreading fixed costs over more nights. No decision has been made, and the Government has published no cost estimate for Linton-on-Ouse.

In August, the same group put the cost at £403.4m over three years. The Home Office said it did not recognise those figures.

A total of this scale is not impossible: the National Audit Office put expected lifetime costs for the larger Wethersfield and Scampton sites at £339m and £404m. But nothing in the article shows £270m is the likely cost.

The Daily Express reaches up to 16.4 million people.

Help us set the record straight: share this rebuttal, and help fund the fight against press disinformation using the actions above.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Fight back: Daily Mail claimed HS2 tunnelling “causes” Victorian houses in Queen’s Park to “sink and crack”. The truth: The cause has not been established. The article cited no engineering assessment, and HS2 says settlement is small and in line with expectations.
No, HS2 has not been shown to have cracked these Queen’s Park homes
A Daily Mail headline said HS2 tunnelling causes Victorian homes in north-west London to sink and crack. But this is speculation; the cause has not been established.
11/6/26
Fight back
Fight back: The Telegraph claimed Prime Minister Andy Burnham is “open to slavery payouts”. The truth: The Government has ruled out financial reparations for slavery. Ministers said so on the record the morning the story was published.
No, the Prime Minister is not “open to slavery payouts”
The Telegraph claimed Andy Burnham was open to “slavery payouts”. The Government had ruled out financial reparations on the record that same morning.
11/6/26
Fight back
Fight back: Daily Mail claimed the Ministry of Defence “blows £3million on ‘diversity’”. The truth: The figure is the Mail’s own estimate from 53 job titles. The MoD says these staff don’t work exclusively on diversity.
No, the Mail hasn’t shown the MoD ‘blows £3million on diversity’
The Daily Mail’s “£3million on diversity” headline is its own estimate from 53 job titles, and the MoD says those staff don’t work exclusively on diversity.
11/2/26
Fight back
Fight back: Daily Express claimed a “shocking £33bn cost of open-doors migration policy” has been “revealed”. The truth: The £33bn is Reform UK’s own projection, with no published method. No 10 says it isn’t proposing a return to free movement.
No, the £33bn ‘cost’ of migration wasn’t ‘revealed’ – it’s Reform UK’s own unexplained projection
The Daily Express presented Reform UK’s unexplained £33bn projection as a “revealed” cost of an “open-doors” policy the Government isn’t proposing.
11/2/26
Fight back