News

Sun’s picture editor tells court he had no idea payments from the paper’s picture budget had gone to pay public officials

28/11/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

The Sun’s picture editor had no idea that payments sanctioned from the paper’s picture budget had gone to pay public officials and did not properly look at the emails requesting them, he told The Sun corruption trial today.

John Edwards was copied into three email chains from reporter Jamie Pyatt requesting payments for a police officer or a Broadmoor official and was also sent a direct request for a cash payment for Mr Pyatt’s police contact.

On each occasion Mr Pyatt received the cash payments from the picture desk.

However Mr Edwards, whose father is the veteran Sun royal photographer Arthur Edwards, said that he may not have received one email, probably “skim” read another and failed to properly scrutinise the other two.

Asked by his lawyer Sasha Wass QC: “Did you ever know or suspect that he [Mr Pyatt] was paying a serving police officer for information?" he replied: “Not at all.”

To the question: “Did you ever suspect or know that he was paying a nurse at Broadmoor for information?", Mr Edwards told the court: “No”.

In answer to questions from Ms Wass, he said that he had never wanted to be made the Sun’s picture editor, under editor David Yelland in 2002.

Under Rebekah Brooks’ editorship, he told the court, he was put under “huge pressure” to get pictures that would sell the paper.

Asked what kind of pictures, he said: “Good show business, good glamour – you can talk about sexy pictures of Kelly Brook, if you like. But showbiz, mainly".

“But news also.”

Ms Wass asked: “Did you have any training about anything?”

Mr Edwards replied: "No, not really."

“Privacy: was that something on your radar?” his lawyer asked.

He told the court: "Yeah, privacy. Pictures of children; where were the pictures taken; were you on public property when you took the picture; did you follow them – just generally trying to follow the code, the PCC code."

The court heard that at 8.09am one day in 2006 Mr Pyatt emailed the Sun news editor Chris Pharo, and copied in Mr Edwards, requesting payments for two stories. Mr Pyatt wrote: "Can I bung £250 to the policeman and £250 from the picture desk to the soldier."

There was no recorded response from Mr Edwards, though the payment was made by the picture desk.

Ms Wass asked Mr Edwards: “Can you say one way or another whether you were at work that day?"

No," he said.

His QC went on: “And even if you were at work whether you would have responded?”

Again Mr Edwards said: "No."

He told the court: "I don't remember this email."

On 2 February 2010 Mr Pyatt emailed Mr Pharo, copying in Mr Edwards, asking for payment to a Broadmoor public official.

Mr Edwards responded: “OK, Jamie.”

He said that when he would have received the email, 8.39am, he would have been "hugely busy with viewing pictures and trying to get ready for conference.""As far as I'm concerned this is Jamie asking for money off my budget,” he said.

“Sometimes we would be under budget pressure. Most of the time at the Sun, money was never really any problem… but sometime we would have budget grief and we [news and picture desks] would help each other out."

In a third email, Mr Pyatt wrote: “Hi Chris and John, My police contact did a brilliant job for me on a man who stabbed his wife to death and then jumped in front of train... Can I get him £500 words and £250 pix?"

Mr Edwards replied: "OK, Jamie"Asked what he understood by ‘police contact’, Mr Edwards told the court: "It could have been anybody. I'm not sure I considered greatly when I was reading this."

He said: "I would have skim read this email."

Mr Pyatt directly emailed him to chase up a payment he had requested 11 days earlier for a scoop on an alleged plot to poison the Anne Summers boss Jacqueline Gold.

Mr Pyatt wrote: "Hi John, my police contact re the exclusive page nine... is getting grumpy. Any chance of sorting that £250 for the Thomas Cook in Maidenhead?"

Two minutes later, Mr Edwards replied: "Yes, of course, I'll get Vicky to sort."

Asked how much attention he would have paid to the email, Mr Edwards said: "It's something I think has been agreed..."He said: "I've got complete faith in Jamie. I'm not worried about anything he says."

Ms Wass said the total amount the picture desk allegedly spent on payments to public officials was £1,625 over nine years.

Asked how much that was, Mr Edwards said: “Minuscule. I had a budget of £3 million or £4 million a year."

Mr Edwards, Mr Pyatt, Mr Pharo and three other past and present Sun journalists deny conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office.

Oliver Glasgow, for the Crown, is due to cross-examine Mr Edwards on Monday.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News