News

Daily Mirror close second in contest for least column inches...about the Daily Mirror

25/09/2014

Joan Smith and Michelle Gribbon

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Joan Smith and Michelle Gribbon

It’s always a tricky question for news executives: how do you cover stories which are not only about your own titles but don’t exactly show your publisher in a rosy light? The latest newspaper to face this dilemma is the Daily Mirror, which has had to respond to Wednesday’s admission, by publisher Trinity Mirror, that phone hacking did go on at Mirror group titles.

It represents a volte-face by the publisher, which for years denied wrong-doing by its journalists. Now it has admitted liability in four cases, settled six others and agreed to pay compensation. The first category consists of the BBC’s creative director Alan Yentob, the Eastenders actors Shane Richie and Lucy Benjamin, and the Coronation Street actor Shobna Gulati. The second includes the ex-footballer Gary Flitcroft, the former England manager Sven Goran-Eriksson and the actor Christopher Eccleston.

Faced with this dramatic turn-around, the Daily Mirror managed to find space for only three terse paragraphs on page 2 of today’s paper. ‘6 phone hack cases settled’ was the bland headline, avoiding any mention of the Mirror and leaving readers to find out about the other four cases in the final paragraph.

The total number of words devoted to the story by the Mirror was 69, a figure beaten for brevity by The Sun’s 61-word article. To be fair, the print edition of the Daily Express didn’t even enter the race, ignoring both the admission of liability and the settlements. The Daily Star found space for seven paragraphs, but you would have had to get as far as page 21 to read it. In the Daily Mail, the story was relegated to page 24.

You might be forgiven for thinking that the first admission of phone hacking by titles not owned by Rupert Murdoch is a major development in the continuing phone hacking scandal. According to the country’s most widely-read newspapers, however, you would be wrong – and that’s despite the fact that 19 more individuals have issued hacking claims against Trinity Mirror. Lawyers say many more could follow.

As they say in the trade, don’t watch this space….

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News