News

Greenslade challeges Fake Sheikh's evidence to Leveson Inquiry

25/01/2012

Evidence from an undercover reporter known as the 'Fake Sheikh' has been challenged by his former editor at the Leveson Inquiry today.Mazher Mahmood, whose image was not broadcast to protect his identity, was questioned over his resignation from the Sunday Times in 1988. A written statement from Roy Greenslade, managing editor of the paper at the time, was read out to the inquiry.An article written by Mahmood in 1988 reported that a chief inspector, convicted for drink driving, had been demoted to constable rather than inspector.The journalist claimed the error had been made by a news agency supplying the story, but was later found to have covered up his mistake by altering the original copy. He told the inquiry he regretted his actions and realised he had acted improperly.He added: “I had a series of run-ins with Mr Greenslade while at the paper… I foolishly thought the best thing was to cover my mistake, it was the wrong thing to do and I resigned."Greenslade responded on Twitter: “Mahmood #Leveson Continues to say I had disagreements with him at Sunday Times - Can't remember one. Treated him same as other reporters [sic]."David Barr, junior counsel to the inquiry, asked Mahmood why he was not forthcoming on the “act of dishonesty” when appearing before Lord Justice Leveson in December 2011.Mahmood replied: “It wasn’t a highlight of my career, obviously, it wasn’t something that I elaborated on."He said a claim made by Michael Williams, former news editor at the Sunday Times, was “completely untrue”. Williams said a reporter, believed to be Mahmood, offered a financial bribe to staff to falsify his copy in an article written last year.Mahmood added: “It's a completely untrue allegation. Can I point out that Mr Williams also left the Sunday Times under something of a cloud."Mahmood, who now works as an investigative reporter for the Sunday Times, was employed by the News of the World until its closure last year.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News