News

Judge tells jury they have to decide if a journalist paying a civil servant was in the public interest

24/11/2014

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

An Old Bailey judge told a jury today they had to decide if a journalist paying a civil servant for information was in the public interest or a commercially driven "corrupt relationship," noting that: "the fact that a journalist thought a story was in the public interest is not a defence to this charge."

His Honour Judge Rook was summing up the case at the end of the three week trial of Sun Westminster correspondent Clodagh Hartley, who is charged with conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office after paying an HMRC press officer over £14,000 for information, including advance details of the 2010 budget.

Counsel for Hartley has told the court that her source, Jonathan Hall, was widely known amongst senior managers at the newspaper and at no point did anyone tell her: "you should stop doing that." Emails between senior Sun staff given to the jury contained an instruction to Hartley to remove Hall's name from the News International computer system as he was an "important source."

The judge then directed the members of the jury that to find the reporter guilty they would have to be sure that she knew that the civil servant's conduct was so serious as to amount to a significant "breach of the public's trust." The prosecution has argued that Hall, who was in charge of media relations for HMRC's law enforcement desk was driven merely by greed and ended up in the position of having: "two paymasters," the taxpayer and News International.

During the course of the trial the jury has also been told about a culture of "bullying" at the Sun, with documents shown to the court about a successful claim of harassment taken out by Hartley against a senior member of the newspaper's staff who the journalist testified she was "terrified of." Also on trial is the civil servant's partner Marta Bukarewicz who had large sums of money from News International paid into her bank account before transferring them to the civil servant.

Both of the accused deny the charges. The jury is expected to retire and consider its verdict on Monday afternoon.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News