News

Jurors at The Sun corruption trial are still deadlocked

21/01/2015

By Martin HickmanJurors at The Sun corruption trial are still deadlocked on all nine remaining charges despite deliberating for 45 hours, Kingston Crown Court heard today.In dramatic scenes this afternoon, all the defendants and lawyers were called back into Court 9 at 2.49pm to hear whether the 12-strong jury had reached verdicts on the senior journalists Chris Pharo, Jamie Pyatt, Graham Dudman and Ben O'Driscoll.However, Judge Richard Marks QC disclosed that the jury had sent him a note indicating that they were still unable to agree on any verdicts.Before delivering partial verdicts in five counts in the case on Friday, the jury sent the judge an earlier note giving their voting numbers on individual counts. Judge Marks did not disclose the numbers then or today.Formally asked by the court clerk this afternoon whether the jury had reached a verdict on any of the remaining courts, the jury foreman replied: "No". Judge Marks sent the dozen members of the public back into the jury room to continue their deliberations. He told them: "I'm going to ask you to retire and continue your deliberations to see if you can reach verdicts on which at least 10 of you are agreed."On Friday the jury returned not guilty verdicts on all the counts faced by The Sun's picture editor John Edwards and the paper's former East Anglia reporter John Troup. They also acquitted The Sun's development director Graham Dudman and its former deputy news editor Ben O'Driscoll of one count each.Mr Dudman, Mr O'Driscoll and Mr Pharo, The Sun's head of news, and Mr Pyatt, the paper's Thames Valley reporter, face the remaining nine charges.Before sending the jury out to continue their deliberations this morning, Mr Justice Marks said that if unanimous verdicts could not be reached, he would accept majority verdicts of 10-2 or 11-1.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News