News

New media covering old: crowd-funding the trial of Neil Wallis

26/05/2015

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

One of the most interesting court cases for followers of the phone hacking scandal is about to begin. Neil Wallis, one of the biggest figures in tabloid journalism, is due to go on trial at the Old Bailey next week (3 June 2015) accused of conspiring to intercept the phone messages of newsworthy individuals. He is alleged to have committed the offence while an executive of the News of the World between 2003 and 2007 with six of the paper’s journalists, its private detective Glenn Mulcaire and other un-named conspirators.

Mr Wallis, who has been a vociferous media critic of the prosecution of tabloid journalists, denies all the allegations.

In collaboration with Byline, I have launched a crowd-funding appeal to cover his trial.Why?During the hacking trial of Rebekah Brooks many facts emerged about the culture inside the News International newspaper group and its relationship with police and politicians. Hacked Off funded my coverage of that case because it feared that newspaper reporting would be partial and piecemeal. Hacked Off and Inforrm published my reports free online for anyone to read.

Hacked Off say they were pleased with that work but are prioritising other expenditure at the moment so I have teamed up with Byline.com, which crowd-funds journalism projects direct from the public.

With the future of independent reporting growing parlous, Byline might just be a bright future for journalism.

It’s early days, though – and projects need the support of curious and determined individuals.

The Wallis trial is scheduled to last 4-6 weeks before the jury retires to consider its verdicts.

I am seeking a total of £3,000 to cover the prosecution case – and the defence response. I will live-tweet the case and write a daily story of the main developments. They will be free to the public to read. Supporters receive tiered rewards linked to the value of donations.

You can see more information here

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News