News

News International security head: I wouldn't commit a crime for anyone

03/04/2014

By Martin HickmanNews International's head of security today denied being part of a plot to shield Rebekah Brooks and the newspaper group from the Metropolitan Police's investigation into phone hacking.Mark Hanna, suspended on full pay by the newspaper company when he was charged in May 2012, said he would not commit a crime for anyone.Chief prosecutor Andrew Edis challenged Mr Hanna on the alleged plot to hide bags belonging to Mrs Brooks's husband, Charlie, from the police on 17 July 2011.During his three days in the witness box, Mr Hanna explained that he agreed to look after Mr Brooks's briefcase on the morning of 17 Sunday, when the Brooks's and their security team drove from Oxfordshire to London, where Mrs Brooks was arrested.Mr Hanna then agreed to keep from police a Jiffy bag and a laptop hidden behind bins in the car park below the Brooks's London flat because, he told the court, they contained embarrassing (though legal) pornography.The property was returned to the flat later, along with delivery of pizza - only to be hidden behind bins again and discovered the following day by a cleaner.Mr Hanna told the Old Bailey that he had never heard the term used by members of his security team to describe the weekend's events: "pizzagate."When told that "gate" was added to cover-ups such as Watergate, Mr Hanna, formerly head of security at the Tower of London, told the Old Bailey: "The first Watergate I came across was the Water Gate at the Tower of London..."When Mr Edis suggested that moving Mr Brooks's property around on day his wife had been arrested would have been "dangerous" and must have been done "for some real purpose," Mr Hanna replied: "I don't understand the word 'dangerous'. I wouldn't commit a crime for anyone."As far as I believe what I did was legal."Mr Edis challenged the idea that that day's events were "spur of the moment", to which Mr Hanna replied: "What I have told you is absolutely true."Mr Hanna and Mr and Mrs Brooks deny conspiring to pervert the course of justice. The case continues tomorrow.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News