News

News International security head: I wouldn't commit a crime for anyone

03/04/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

News International's head of security today denied being part of a plot to shield Rebekah Brooks and the newspaper group from the Metropolitan Police's investigation into phone hacking.

Mark Hanna, suspended on full pay by the newspaper company when he was charged in May 2012, said he would not commit a crime for anyone.

Chief prosecutor Andrew Edis challenged Mr Hanna on the alleged plot to hide bags belonging to Mrs Brooks's husband, Charlie, from the police on 17 July 2011.

During his three days in the witness box, Mr Hanna explained that he agreed to look after Mr Brooks's briefcase on the morning of 17 Sunday, when the Brooks's and their security team drove from Oxfordshire to London, where Mrs Brooks was arrested.

Mr Hanna then agreed to keep from police a Jiffy bag and a laptop hidden behind bins in the car park below the Brooks's London flat because, he told the court, they contained embarrassing (though legal) pornography.

The property was returned to the flat later, along with delivery of pizza - only to be hidden behind bins again and discovered the following day by a cleaner.

Mr Hanna told the Old Bailey that he had never heard the term used by members of his security team to describe the weekend's events: "pizzagate."

When told that "gate" was added to cover-ups such as Watergate, Mr Hanna, formerly head of security at the Tower of London, told the Old Bailey: "The first Watergate I came across was the Water Gate at the Tower of London..."When Mr Edis suggested that moving Mr Brooks's property around on day his wife had been arrested would have been "dangerous" and must have been done "for some real purpose," Mr Hanna replied: "I don't understand the word 'dangerous'. I wouldn't commit a crime for anyone."

As far as I believe what I did was legal."

Mr Edis challenged the idea that that day's events were "spur of the moment", to which Mr Hanna replied: "What I have told you is absolutely true."

Mr Hanna and Mr and Mrs Brooks deny conspiring to pervert the course of justice. The case continues tomorrow.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News