News

Senior Treasury Official questioned over "political leaks" of budget news in Sun reporter trial

07/11/2014

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Leaks of information to the Sun: "undermined the budget process," and may have led to a lower tax revenue for the government but yet, no investigation was ever undertaken a court was told yesterday.

Richard Lester, Head of Security for Her Majesty’s Treasury, told an Old Bailey jury that articles in the Sun on the morning of the 2010 budget revealing that fuel and alcohol duty were to rise may have led to people: "rushing out to buy them, leading to a loss of revenue for the government," adding "any diminution of tax coming in leaves the country the poorer." However the official also confirmed that no investigation was ever launched over the alleged leaks.

The evidence came during the trial of Sun Whitehall correspondent Clodagh Hartley who is charged, along with Marta Bukarewicz, with conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office by allegedly purchasing confidential information from a HMRC press officer Jonathan Hall, including details of the 2010 budget.

Cross-examining Mr Lester, defence QC Alexandra Healey noted that, when Alistair Darling was Chancellor, the Treasury confirmed to newspapers that it planned to cut VAT to 15%. "Was this not price sensitive information?" Healey asked. Lester responded that it was "not unusual" for political parties to release proposals that might benefit them, or to see how the public would react to a new measure adding "there is authority there, so it is not a leak."

The Sun journalist's defence team also told the court about events in 2013 when the London Evening Standard was given advance information on the budget and the mistakenly tweeted out a picture of their forthcoming front-page with the details before the Chancellor had risen in the House of Commons. The security head said that he was aware of the incident but drew a distinction between a "leak" which was unauthorised and special advisers giving the media information which was: "agreed by their political masters." Asked to comment further Lester said "Special advisers do all sorts of things we do not know about, identifying if stories came from leaks is something we find very difficult."

Both of the defendants deny the charges, the trial continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News