News

Hacking Trial: NI security guards 'used war film codewords' during covert operation to hide evidence

04/11/2013

Martin Hickman

DAY 6 - Mon 4 NovBy Martin HickmanSecurity guards working for News International used codewords from war films and the Cold War during a covert operation to hide evidence from the police, the Old Bailey heard today.

Andrew Edis, prosecuting, read out text messages between the security guards while claiming that Rebekah Brooks, her husband Charlie and News International's head of security, Mark Hanna, plotted to conceal evidence from police prior to her arrest in July 2011.

On July 17 2011, he told the jury, computers and other material were removed from the home of the Brookses and hidden - probably behind some bins, he said - at their home in Chelsea Harbour, London. The computers were later found and handed to the police.

One of the messages read: "Broadsword to Danny Boy. Pizza's delivered and the chicken is in the pot." According to Mr Edis, "Broadsword to Danny Boy" was the codeword used by Richard Burton's character in the Second World War film Where Eagles Dare.

Another message - shown on a screen to the jury - suggested that one of the guards thought they should have used a "DLB" - or dead letter box, a technique used by Cold War spies.

Mr Edis said the Crown's case was not that the computers contained "devastating evidence of phone hacking" but that "the only rational explanation for it [the alleged stowing of the material] was that it was designed to hide material so the police didn't get it."

Mrs Brooks and her personal assistant are separately accused of trying to pervert the course of justice by removing seven boxes of her journalistic notebooks from News International's archive on 8 July 2011. The notebooks have never been found, Mr Edis told the jury.

Earlier this morning, he told the court that Mrs Brooks had taken an active interest in the deletion of emails at News International covering the period of phone hacking.

He read out an email by her in July 2010 setting the date before which all emails should be destroyed. It read: "Yes to jan 2010. Clean sweep."

All defendants deny the charges. The case continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News