News

New revelations reignite the phone-hacking scandal - Nick Davies’s updated exposé publishes ahead of ITV’s David Tennant drama

09/06/2025

‍

Investigative journalist Nick Davies, who first exposed the phone-hacking scandal in the Guardian newspaper, has published an updated edition of his landmark book Hack Attack on 4 September 2025. The new edition features a substantial and revelatory final chapter that brings the story right up to the present day, presenting explosive new evidence of wrongdoing at the heart of Rupert Murdoch’s UK newspaper empire.

First published in 2014, Hack Attack was a Sunday Times bestseller and shortlisted for the Orwell Prize, the Samuel Johnson Prize for Non-Fiction and the Financial Times Business Book of the Year. Davies’s reporting triggered six separate police inquiries, multiple arrests and criminal trials, and the Leveson Inquiry into press culture and ethics.

The new evidence:

In this updated edition, Davies draws on material disclosed during recent High Court litigation to reveal:

  • Systematic political surveillance - court-ordered records show hundreds of suspect calls from a Murdoch corporate “hub” number to senior politicians, including then-Prime Minister Gordon Brown,  raising questions about whether corporate staff as well as journalists were involved in illegal information-gathering.
  • Parliamentary scrutiny compromised - MPs on the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee investigating phone hacking, including Tom Watson and Paul Farrelly, were themselves subject to waves of  calls from Murdoch numbers during crucial closed sessions and hearings. One MP described this as an attempt to “subvert the democratic process.” Damages were later paid, without admissions of liability.
  • BSkyB bid interference  - during Rupert Murdoch’s  2010–11 takeover attempt, unexplained calls reached Business Secretary Vince Cable and adviser Norman Lamb. Both said they could find no innocent explanation, and both later received substantial settlements.
  • Evidence destruction and concealment - between late 2010 and early 2011, millions of company emails were purged and backup tapes deliberately “scratched”. In July 2011, police discovered a cache of preserved messages hidden in an under-floor safe near the chief executive’s office.
  • Executives at the centre - court pleadings and sworn police statements point to the roles of Rebekah Brooks and Will Lewis in decisions about what evidence to preserve and disclose.  Senior detectives now say they would have treated Lewis as a suspect had this material been available to them at the time.
  • Attacks on critics - new records show efforts to target MPs, and even Davies himself, with covert background investigations designed to find “stunning dirt” in order to discredit those challenging the company.

The new chapter also chronicles how, in January 2025, with Prince Harry and Lord Watson preparing to take the case to trial, News Group Newspapers reached a last-minute settlement of £13.5 million. This avoided a public hearing of the broader allegations, prompting one observer to describe the outcome as “the best justice money can buy.”

Nick Davies said:

“This extraordinary story has produced an extraordinary new chapter, and I think it’s terribly important that we understand what happens in the corridors of power.”

The updated edition of HackAttack appears just weeks before the premiere of ITV’s seven-part drama The Hack, from the team behind Mr Bates vs The Post Office. Starring David Tennant as Nick Davies, the series will air for the first time on 24 September 2025, bringing the scandal’s story to a prime time audience.

Publication details

  • Title: Hack Attack: The Full Story of the Phone-Hacking Scandal (Updated Edition)
  • Author: Nick Davies
  • Publisher: Vintage
  • Publication date: 4 September 2025

‍

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News