News

Coulson: "Do his phone" did not mean hack his phone

13/12/2013

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

DAY 30 - Andy Coulson's lawyers today revealed his defence to the suggestion that his instruction to "do his phone" was a command to hack the phone of reality TV contestant Calum Best.

At the phone hacking trial at the Old Bailey, Timothy Langdale QC, representing Mr Coulson, explained that the editor of the News of the World was merely ordering a check of one of the paper's phones as part of a leak inquiry.

As part of the prosecution case, the jury has been told of an email which Mr Coulson sent to an executive on the redtop Sunday tabloid about a forthcoming kiss and tell story on Mr Best.

On being told by the executive, of whom Mr Coulson had inquired "You think Calum a leak?" - that Mr Best was "bragging I have close mates inside NotW", Mr Coulson's three-word response was: "Do his phone."

Today, Mr Langdale explained the context to Mr Coulson's email, dated 20 May 2006.

In an email dated 11 May 2006, Mr Langdale told the jury, Stuart Kuttner, NoW managing editor, had received billing data for a phone belonging to reporter Rav Singh, who had dealt with Mr Best in the past.

Mr Langdale said: "In early April it was clear from submissions made on behalf of Mr Coulson in preliminary submissions [pre-trial hearings which could not be reported at the time] that Mr Coulson's case was that "Do his phone" was not an instruction to hack Calum Best's phone but to check on the billing of another News of the World phone for a suspected leak."

Mr Coulson and Mr Kuttner deny plotting to hack phones at the trial, which is nearing the end of its seventh week. The other five defendants also deny all charges.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News