News

News

Desmond supports libellous coverage of Madeleine McCann's disappearance

12/01/2012

Controversial proprietor Richard Desmond has supported the libellous coverage of his newspapers over the McCanns.

Robert Jay QC accused him as he gave evidence to the Leveson Inquiry of “grotesque characterisation” over the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. This came after Desmond questioned the length of time it took for the McCanns to take legal action against the press.

Desmond said newspapers should be allowed to report on opinions as well as fact, and added: "There are views about the McCanns and what happened".

The owner of Northern & Shell, which includes the Express and Star, apologised to the McCanns several times when giving evidence but said the PCC had scapegoated Express Newspapers over national coverage of the story. He said if 38 articles had been labelled defamatory, then many more printed in the paper must have been acceptable.

Desmond tried to defend Express and Star coverage by comparing rumours over Madeleine's disappearance to conspiracy theories about the death of Princess Diana.

He also told the inquiry he didn't know what the word "ethical" meant. He said: "We do not talk about ethics or morals because it’s a very fine line".

Desmond said he would "get rid" of the inquiry, which he called "probably the worst thing that’s happened to newspapers in my lifetime”, and focus on prosecuting people guilty of phone-hacking.

He described a new regulator called the “RCD board” to replace the PCC. When Lord Justice Leveson asked what this stood for, he said: “Richard Clive Desmond”. Jay became visibly irritated when Desmond later said he thought it was “a good name”.

Desmond also said he felt he had betrayed Tony Blair "as a mate" when the Express switched to supporting the Conservatives in 2004, but backed the decision of editor Peter Hill.

He met Blair after buying Express Newspapers in 2000 and the pair talked about "music and drums" before the then Prime Minster asked about politics. Desmond said he took the decision to back Labour because Blair "seemed a nice fellow".

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
Reporting montage
Professor Arday, IPSO, and the press: steps to end the cycle of tragedy
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg, Professor of Media Law at the University of Leeds, on why the press hounding of Professor Jason Arday will happen again unless politicians act.
8/16/26
News