Press Regulation

Hacked Off campaign statement in response to Daily Mail articles

03/11/2011

Lord Judge’s misjudged references to press self-regulation

24/10/2011

Why a professional registry of journalists is a bad idea

28/09/2011

Who is talking about statutory CONTROL of the Press?

08/11/2012

Let’s get over this terror of the word ‘statutory’

27/03/2012

Hacked Off and Media Standards Trust host debate in the House of Commons

01/03/2012

WAN-IFRA's 'conclusions' on press self-regulation analysed

17/03/2014

Bias, bigotry and time for a regulator that honours Leveson’s recommendations

03/03/2014

The Royal Charter in 2014, and the Prime Minister's thoughts

07/01/2014

IMPRESS: A welcome initiative

11/12/2013

Lord Grade at the Society of Editors: Inaccuracy, muddle and confusion

12/11/2013

Press regulation debate: Supporting the Leveson System, a reply to Helen Anthony

04/11/2013

The Law Is Not Enough: Five reasons why the law on its own can never be enough to prevent press abuses

28/10/2013

A letter to the Queen that its authors should be ashamed of

24/10/2013

Response to letter to Queen from international press organisations

24/10/2013

Putting the Sun's poll in context

21/10/2013

YouGov Poll: Public backs Court’s decision in Cliff Richard Case, 86% favour investigation anonymity

25/07/2018

Matt Hancock makes himself 'State Approver' of press arbitration

22/05/2018

Dacre resignation provides no comfort to the victims of Daily Mail misconduct and alleged illegal newsgathering

06/06/2018

Hacked Off's submission to the CMA in response to their Fox/Sky bid provisional findings report

14/02/2018

The Mail's way with words

11/10/2012